christian ubuntu released

[David Wolverton]

> On 9/18/06, Ian <ilox11 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Alphax, Bruce and Robyn. Was wondering just how it differed,
> > had not noticed the 'human' wallpapers. That alone would make it
> > worthwhile for the wowser brigade to come out fighting ;)
> >
> > An electronic bible? Worthy of inclusion I guess, at least for their
> > niche of the audience.
> >
> > Usually these distros are filled with 'utilities' and 'tools' which
> > stretch the ISO to full capacity. Wondering what else they 
> might have
> > left out to provide room for their extra 'features'?
> 
> Ian,
> 
> Please show some tolerance for people who believe something different
> to you, but if that's too hard please keep silent (aka criticise when
> it's related to Linux, leave other bigotries on linuxsa-talk)

Hi Michael/all,

I have to say that I didn't notice any bigotries in anything Ian wrote.
Personally, I think it's reasonable to ask/wonder how 'Christian' ubuntu
differs from 'atheist/agnostic' ubuntu. (Okay - a bad joke; forgive me
for trying to lighten this up a bit) :-)  Further, I agree with Ian that
if such 'human' wallpapers were included that it WOULD get a wowser
brigade stampeding...  (I'd probably be at the forefront if I decided
against ignoring the thread)  I also agree that an electronic bible is a
reasonable/appropriate inclusion for a 'Christian' Distro of ubuntu - as
well as understanding his observation that as Distro's ARE usually
jam-packed; it's also (imo) reasonable to wonder what might be left out
to concentrate on Christian orientated paraphernalia...

Accordingly, I'd submit that either I'm dumber than I think I am (Oh
no...  I've opened the flood gates there!) or perhaps there's been a
misunderstanding about what Ian's written?  So... unless I've radically
missed something obvious - such as a particularly inflammatory post I
didn't get - can we just put this down as a
misunderstanding/misinterpretation and move on?  :-)


Regards,
DFW