A valid reason for top posting? (GPRS data costs)

[quixote8]

Allan wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:16, Andrew Pam wrote:
>   
>> On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 16:06 +0930, quixote8 wrote:
>>     
>>> "Grrrr ...... bottom posting (as default)
>>> It is tedious, time wasting and annoying to have to re-read or fart
>>> around with long serial posts that you have already read (maybe
>>> several times)
                "IF, and only IF, If is a long series of posts AND  you 
have not been following the stages.

                Then, and only Then, does bottom posting make sense."

Was the full quote
And it stands      ;)
>>> It is equally tedious, time wasting and annoying (not to mention 
>>> frustrating) to have to read a long serial post in reverse order (or 
>>> worse if people both top and bottom post) just because some people are 
>>> too damned lazy/ignorant to put their reply in sequential order.
>>>
>>>       
>> Or, and I know this is a radical concept, people could edit their posts
>> to remove all but the relevant passages they are replying to.
>>     
>
> Really!  I think you're pushing the limits. This is outrageous, fancy 
> asking people to do more than add "me too".  :-)
>
> Allan
>
>