A valid reason for top posting? (GPRS data costs)

[Allan]

On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:16, Andrew Pam wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 16:06 +0930, quixote8 wrote:
> > "Grrrr ...... bottom posting (as default)
> > It is tedious, time wasting and annoying to have to re-read or fart
> > around with long serial posts that you have already read (maybe
> > several times)

It is equally tedious, time wasting and annoying (not to mention 
frustrating) to have to read a long serial post in reverse order (or 
worse if people both top and bottom post) just because some people are 
too damned lazy/ignorant to put their reply in sequential order.

> Or, and I know this is a radical concept, people could edit their posts
> to remove all but the relevant passages they are replying to.

Really!  I think you're pushing the limits. This is outrageous, fancy 
asking people to do more than add "me too".  :-)

Allan