Content Management Systems

[Shaun Branden]

On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 11:55:27AM +0930, Andrew Reid wrote:

> >It wasn't directed at you, it is just my new linuxsa sig. I have been
> >using it on other lists for years and started on linuxsa yesterday  
> >as a
> >result of one of DW's emails. It is a sig- that is all. Absolutely
> >nothing at all to do with you. However your reaction to it says  
> >volumes.
> 
> OK, fair enough. It's reasonable for that sort of reaction to be  
> drawn in the context of the rest of your message. Speaking of things  
> that say volumes, I notice that you've actually ignored the majority  
> of my mail. There was a bit of important stuff in there, Shaun. Stuff  
> like the argument that the open source solution isn't always the  
> right one, just the same as the proprietary solution isn't always the  
> right one.
> 
> Why didn't you respond to that, Shaun? Because you know I'm right?  
> Maybe because you couldn't be bothered. I don't know.
> 
> Whatever the case, it really is a shame, Shaun, because again, in  
> this reply of yours, you've chosen to ignore the Linux bit and have a  
> crack at another bloke. Why, Shaun? Why won't you debate the  
> technology issues?

Because it is a beautiful day, half the kids are missing and I have
pre-booked shed time.

This little black duck is spending the day milling timber and making a
bed.

There is more to life than computers :)

shaun
-- 
Top-posting "This term is generally used pejoratively with the
implication that the offending person is a newbie, a Microsoft
addict (Microsoft mail tools produce a similar format by default),
or simply a common-and-garden-variety idiot." - Eric Raymond