[OT) Elections - Was almost anything
bastill at adam.com.au
Wed Dec 18 15:15:05 CST 2002
Freeman, Peter (ERHS) wrote:
>I don't really know what system would be better here, but there's something
>about having either of the 2 major parties getting the points at the end of
>an election that doesn't sit right with me. It also doesn't encourage any
>minor parties to have decent policies, ie: it doesn't matter that their
>would never hold water in the real world because they'll never be in power.
>Anyway, just my lunch break musings..... :)
Perhaps you should have more lunch breaks :-)
One system favoured by Saphologists (?) is multi-seat electorates.
Imagine every 5 current adjacent electorates combined, with electors
casting thir vote to elect 5 people in each such large electorate. The
outcome would be likely to be a far greater number of minor parties and
independents in Parliament, far more representative of the electors
views than is possible at present.
The reason we don't have this or any other more representative system is
that it doesn't suit the major parties, and they unfortunately have all
LinuxSA WWW: http://www.linuxsa.org.au/ IRC: #linuxsa on irc.openprojects.net
To unsubscribe from the LinuxSA list:
mail linuxsa-request at linuxsa.org.au with "unsubscribe" as the subject
More information about the linuxsa