LinuxSA Mailing list archives
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Daryl Tester <dt@picknowl.com.au>
To : LinuxSA <linuxsa@linuxsa.org.au>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 21:23:58 +1030
Re: Printtool
Mike Andrew wrote:
>> alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
>> options parport_pc io=0x378 irq=7
> I know you dont have a problem, by i would recommend you knock out the
> unnecessary options line. Or at the very least the irq statement.
You're probably right; at the time I needed the printer up and
running as quickly as possible, and I snarfed this result from
somewhere (most likely a newsgroup posting). I'll try removing
it later when I have the luxury of playing with the settings.
> It's swallowing a scarce IRQ for something that is too slow to be
> useful and can in fact cause hiccups in the print drivers.
What makes the PC hardware different? From my old device driver
days (different architecture), interrupt driving a "slow" peripheral
was much more resource efficient than polling the device, especially
on the CPU. Or is it something peculiar to Linux?
Regards,
Daryl Tester
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
Return to the LinuxSA Mailing List Information Page