LinuxSA Mailing list archives
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
From: Alan Kennington <akenning@dog.topology.org>
To : alex@netcraft.com.au
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 12:38:57 +0930
Re: procmailrc
Alex,
I used to know all this stuff once.
But basically, I think that e-mail gets sent through
procmail as is, with no Status line.
Once the e-mail comes under the control of a
mail reader such as "mail", which is what I use,
it then gets a pseudo-header line appended to
the real mail headers.
It looks like
O = old (i.e. it was already in the mailbox
when the mailbox was last read)
R = read
Therefore my mail-reader shows "N" next to
mails with no Status: pseudo-header, and "U"
next to items with just
Status: O
But items with
Status: RO
are shown as read.
These conventions go way back into medieval unix history.
I had thought that "elm", which was around
certainly in 1983, which is when I first used "elm"
on a Pyramid computer, should be one of the old
traditional mailers which uses the Status: line
"correctly".
Hmmmm....
I just tried "elm" on my suse6.2 machine with the
same mail folder as the RH5.2 "mail".
Result: elm works correctly.
It shows all the statuses of mails correctly.
Therefore: answer to your questions is:
I'm suggesting that you look at the Status fields in
your Mail/linux mailbos to see
what Status fields you ahve, using "less" or
something to look at the file directly.
Cheers,
Alan Kennington.
--
Check out the LinuxSA web pages at http://www.linuxsa.org.au/
To unsubscribe from the LinuxSA list:
mail linuxsa-request@linuxsa.org.au with "unsubscribe" as the subject
Index:
[thread]
[date]
[subject]
[author]
Return to the LinuxSA Mailing List Information Page